Year
2024
Abstract
| The current nuclear security approach is limited as it addresses non-state actors rather than nuclear security threats posed by interstate or intra-state armed conflicts. However, nuclear security embraces the protection of nuclear materials and facilities from unauthorized and malicious actions that state actors could cause. This is not explicitly stated but can reasonably be assumed. This asserts the need to shape the future of nuclear security. Unlike scenarios involving non-state actors, where countermeasures within the international nuclear security framework may suffice, armed conflicts demand a comprehensive re-evaluation of nuclear security policies. The traditional focus on preventing the unauthorized acquisition of nuclear materials and sabotage of nuclear facilities does not address the risk profile when applied to the context of interstate hostilities.The paper will discuss the need for a strong international framework to address emerging nuclear security challenges, especially the ones posed by armed conflicts in and around nuclear facilities. Thus, it would be useful to look at regions in which there is political instability and a strong presence of, or interest in, nuclear technologies. The lessons learned the potential radiological consequences of armed attacks, and the potential increase in the number of nuclear power states in the future underscore the need for a strong international framework to address nuclear security challenges. As there is a greater need to protect nuclear facilities, this will include preventing, where possible, and otherwise managing wartime threats. |