Automated Inspection of Criticality Control Overpacks for Surplus Plutonium Disposition

Year
2025
Author(s)
Michael Tomlin - Savannah River National Laboratory
Camille Kudrna - Savannah River National Laboratory
Nicholas Spivey - Savannah River National Laboratory
Michael Brown - Savannah River National Laboratory
Corey Hopper - Savannah River National Laboratory
Abstract
To reduce the amount of nuclear waste in South Carolina, the Department of Energy (DOE) tasked the Savannah River Site (SRS) with diluting and disposing of the amount of plutonium in the state. This process involves the movement and shipment of over 100,000 Criticality Control Overpacks (CCOs) throughout the project, lending itself to the use of automation to reduce worker radiation exposure and more efficiently utilize human capital. The first opportunity pursued was the receipt and inspection of empty CCO drums coming into SRS, identified as Automation Project 1 (AP1). AP1 was developed to unpack incoming CCOs and inspect them for unwanted foreign objects and any damage to the drum or its contents. This process is accomplished by the combination of an automated guided vehicle (AGV) that delivers CCOs to a robotic arm which uses a suite of custom tools to disassemble a CCO, inspect the inside and outside of the CCO and its inner criticality control container (CCC), reassemble the CCC and CCO, and apply a tamper indicating device (TID) to the inspected drum. In past years, the robotic work cell had been developed in a small-scale testing facility for proof-of-concept. This year, major improvements were made to the robotic work cell to perform the process, including integration into the final facility where CCOs will be inspected. The work cell underwent a six-month testing period after relocation to ensure the project requirements were met. Results of this testing period demonstrate the work cell’s capability to meet project throughput goals at an acceptable level, successfully document the status of each CCO inspected, and reduce the toll on technical operations’ human power by two-thirds.