Gap Analysis by Periodical Reviews of Transport Package Design Safety Reports of German SNF/HLW Dual Purpose Casks

Year
2016
Author(s)
Steffen Komann - BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
Frank Wille - BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
Bernahd Droste - BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing
File Attachment
F5004.pdf450.43 KB
Abstract
Storage of spent nuclear fuel and high-level waste in dual purpose casks (DPC) is related with the challenge of maintaining safety for transportation over several decades of storage. Beside consideration of aging mechanisms by appropriate design, material selection and operational controls to assure technical reliability by aging management measures, an essential issue is the continuous control and update of the DPC safety case. Not only the technical objects are subject of aging but also the safety demonstration basis is subject of “aging” due to possible changes of regulations, standards and scientific/technical knowledge. The basic document, defining the transport safety conditions, is the package design safety report (PDSR) for the transport version of the DPC. To ensure a safe transport in future to a destination which is not known yet (because of not yet existing repository sites) periodical reviews of the PDSR, in connection with periodic renewals of package design approval certificates, have to be carried out. The main reviewing tool is a gap analysis. A gap analysis for a PDSR is the assessment of the state of technical knowledge, standards and regulations regarding safety functions of structures, systems and components.